Behavior of Collocated HA/LMA
draft-tsirtsis-logically-separate-lmaha-01

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2008-10-22
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tsirtsis-logically-separate-lmaha-01.txt

Abstract

In discussions about PMIPv6-MIPv6 interactions in NETLMM WG, scenario C describes the case of collocation of LMA and HA function. In this case a PMIP network emulates the "home link" for MNs using MIPv6. This document argues that even when LMA and HA functions are Collocated they MUST be treated as logically separate entities. In particular this draft argues that PMIP BCEs MUST NOT overwrite MIPv6 BCEs and vice versa.

Authors

George Tsirtsis (tsirtsis@googlemail.com)
Suresh Krishnan (suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)