ARC vs. MRT
draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Pascal Thubert , Srinivasan Ramasubramanian | ||
| Last updated | 2015-07-26 (Latest revision 2015-01-22) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This draft compares the capabilities offered by the Available Routing Construct (ARC) and the Maximally Redundant Trees (MRT) techniques in order to support applicability statements.
Authors
Pascal Thubert
Srinivasan Ramasubramanian
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)