One Way Latency Considerations for MPTCP
draft-song-mptcp-owl-06
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Fei Song , Hong-Ke Zhang , Anthony Chan , Anni Wei | ||
| Last updated | 2019-12-20 (Latest revision 2019-06-18) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document discusses the use of One Way Latency (OWL) for enhancing multipath TCP (MPTCP). Several usages of OWL, such as retransmission policy and crucial data scheduling are analyzed. Two kinds of OWL measurement approaches are also provided and compared. More explorations related with OWL will be contribute to the performance of MPTCP.
Authors
Fei Song
Hong-Ke Zhang
Anthony Chan
Anni Wei
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)