Skip to main content

RFC8287 Sub-TLV Length Clarification
draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-errata-01

Document Type Replaced Internet-Draft (individual)
Expired & archived
Authors Nagendra Kumar Nainar , Carlos Pignataro , faiqbal@cisco.com , Sasha Vainshtein
Last updated 2018-12-18
Replaced by draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Replaced by draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

RFC8287 defines the extensions to MPLS LSP Ping and Traceroute for Segment Routing IGP-Prefix and IGP-Adjacency Segment Identifier (SIDs) with an MPLS data plane. RFC8287 proposes 3 Target FEC Stack Sub-TLVs. While the standard defines the format and procedure to handle those Sub-TLVs, it does not sufficiently clarify how the length of the Segment ID Sub-TLVs should be computed to include in the Length field of the Sub-TLVs which may result in interoperability issues. This document updates RFC8287 by clarifying the length of each Segment ID Sub-TLVs defined in RFC8287.

Authors

Nagendra Kumar Nainar
Carlos Pignataro
faiqbal@cisco.com
Sasha Vainshtein

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)