Skip to main content

Information-Centric Networking (ICN) Adaptation to Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (LoWPANs)
draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-11

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2021-11-24
11 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2021-11-03
11 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48
2021-09-29
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2021-09-29
11 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from IANA
2021-09-29
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2021-09-29
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2021-09-29
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2021-09-29
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from On Hold
2021-09-28
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to On Hold from In Progress
2021-09-28
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from On Hold
2021-09-27
11 (System) RFC Editor state changed to IANA from AUTH
2021-09-27
11 (System) IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed
2021-09-27
11 Cenk Gündoğan New version available: draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-11.txt
2021-09-27
11 (System) New version approved
2021-09-27
11 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Cenk Gundogan , Christian Tschudin , Christopher Scherb , Claudio Marxer , Matthias Waehlisch , Thomas Schmidt
2021-09-27
11 Cenk Gündoğan Uploaded new revision
2021-09-24
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH from EDIT
2021-09-22
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to On Hold from In Progress
2021-09-22
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2021-09-14
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2021-09-14
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2021-09-14
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from On Hold
2021-09-07
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to On Hold from In Progress
2021-09-03
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2021-09-03
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2021-09-03
10 Colin Perkins IRTF state changed to Sent to the RFC Editor from In IESG Review
2021-09-03
10 Colin Perkins Sent request for publication to the RFC Editor
2021-07-26
10 Colin Perkins IRTF state changed to In IESG Review from Waiting for IRTF Chair
2021-07-07
10 Amanda Baber IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed
2021-07-07
10 Amanda Baber
(Via drafts-eval@iana.org): IESG/Authors/ISE:

The IANA Functions Operator has completed its review of draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-10. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us …
(Via drafts-eval@iana.org): IESG/Authors/ISE:

The IANA Functions Operator has completed its review of draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-10. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us know.

We understand that when this document is sent to us for processing, we will add the following entries to the Dispatch Type Field registry at

https://www.iana.org/assignments/_6lowpan-parameters

The designated experts have reviewed these registrations and recommended that page 14 be assigned if that value is still available when the document is sent to us for processing:

+-------------+------+-------------------------------------------+
| Bit Pattern | Page | Header Type                              |
+-------------+------+-------------------------------------------+
|  00 000000  | TBD1 | Uncompressed NDN Interest messages        |
|  00 100000  | TBD1 | Uncompressed NDN Data messages            |
|  01 000000  | TBD1 | Uncompressed CCNx Interest messages      |
|  01 100000  | TBD1 | Uncompressed CCNx Content Object messages |
|  10 0xxxxx  | TBD1 | Compressed NDN Interest messages          |
|  10 1xxxxx  | TBD1 | Compressed NDN Data messages              |
|  11 0xxxxx  | TBD1 | Compressed CCNx Interest messages        |
|  11 1xxxxx  | TBD1 | Compressed CCNx Content Object messages  |
+-------------+------+-------------------------------------------+

Thank you,

Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist
2021-07-02
10 Michelle Cotton IANA Experts State changed to Expert Reviews OK from Reviews assigned
2021-06-29
10 Amanda Baber IANA Experts State changed to Reviews assigned
2021-06-28
10 Colin Perkins IETF conflict review initiated - see conflict-review-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan
2021-05-17
10 Colin Perkins IRTF state changed to Waiting for IRTF Chair from Waiting for Document Shepherd
2021-02-10
10 (System) Revised ID Needed tag cleared
2021-02-10
10 Cenk Gündoğan New version available: draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-10.txt
2021-02-10
10 (System) New version approved
2021-02-10
10 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Cenk Gundogan , Christian Tschudin , Christopher Scherb , Claudio Marxer , Matthias Waehlisch , Thomas Schmidt
2021-02-10
10 Cenk Gündoğan Uploaded new revision
2020-12-21
09 Colin Perkins
IRSG final poll completed with only minor comments. Please review the comments in the datatracker and update the draft if necessary, then I expect this …
IRSG final poll completed with only minor comments. Please review the comments in the datatracker and update the draft if necessary, then I expect this to be ready for IETF conflict review and publication.
2020-12-21
09 Colin Perkins Tag Revised I-D Needed set.
2020-12-21
09 Colin Perkins IRTF state changed to Waiting for Document Shepherd from In IRSG Poll
2020-12-21
09 Colin Perkins Closed "IRSG Approve" ballot
2020-12-10
09 Mallory Knodel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mallory Knodel
2020-12-08
09 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
(Dummy edit, to check if an email goes out this time.)

Section 3.2., paragraph 3:
>    The stateless header compression scheme makes …
[Ballot comment]
(Dummy edit, to check if an email goes out this time.)

Section 3.2., paragraph 3:
>    The stateless header compression scheme makes use of compact bit
>    fields to indicate the presence of optional TLVs in the uncompressed
>    packet.  The order of set bits in the bit fields corresponds to the
>    order of each TLV in the packet.

  Ordering by value (vie the bitfield) can lead to reordering of TLVs
  after compression/decompression - I assume that is OK?

Section 5.1., paragraph 0:
> 5.1.  TLV Encoding

  Any reason why an RFC6256 encoding wasn't chosen here instead of
  inventing a new scheme?

Section 7., paragraph 1:
>    This document adopts the compact time representation
>    [I-D.gundogan-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv] for relative time values.

  Maybe this draft should then normatively depend on the specification
  in [I-D.gundogan-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv] instead of duplicating it here?


Section 13.2., paragraph 2:
>    [I-D.gundogan-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv]
>              Gundogan, C., Schmidt, TC., Oran, D., and M. Waehlisch,
>              "An Alternative Delta Time encoding for CCNx using
>              Interval Time from RFC5497", draft-gundogan-icnrg-ccnx-
>              timetlv-00 (work in progress), November 2019.

  Outdated reference: A later version (-01) exists of
  draft-gundogan-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv-00


Section 13.2., paragraph 3:
>    [I-D.ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery]
>              Thubert, P., "6LoWPAN Selective Fragment Recovery", draft-
>              ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-21 (work in progress), March
>              2020.

  Outdated reference: draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery has been
  published as RFC 8931


Section 13.2., paragraph 4:
>    [I-D.ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment]
>              Watteyne, T., Thubert, P., and C. Bormann, "On Forwarding
>              6LoWPAN Fragments over a Multihop IPv6 Network", draft-
>              ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-15 (work in progress), March
>              2020.

  Outdated reference: draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment has been published
  as RFC 8930
2020-12-08
09 Lars Eggert Ballot comment text updated for Lars Eggert
2020-12-07
09 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2020-12-07
09 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 3.2., paragraph 3:
>    The stateless header compression scheme makes use of compact bit
>    fields to indicate the presence …
[Ballot comment]
Section 3.2., paragraph 3:
>    The stateless header compression scheme makes use of compact bit
>    fields to indicate the presence of optional TLVs in the uncompressed
>    packet.  The order of set bits in the bit fields corresponds to the
>    order of each TLV in the packet.

  Ordering by value (vie the bitfield) can lead to reordering of TLVs
  after compression/decompression - I assume that is OK?

Section 5.1., paragraph 0:
> 5.1.  TLV Encoding

  Any reason why an RFC6256 encoding wasn't chosen here instead of
  inventing a new scheme?

Section 7., paragraph 1:
>    This document adopts the compact time representation
>    [I-D.gundogan-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv] for relative time values.

  Maybe this draft should then normatively depend on the specification
  in [I-D.gundogan-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv] instead of duplicating it here?


Section 13.2., paragraph 2:
>    [I-D.gundogan-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv]
>              Gundogan, C., Schmidt, TC., Oran, D., and M. Waehlisch,
>              "An Alternative Delta Time encoding for CCNx using
>              Interval Time from RFC5497", draft-gundogan-icnrg-ccnx-
>              timetlv-00 (work in progress), November 2019.

  Outdated reference: A later version (-01) exists of
  draft-gundogan-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv-00


Section 13.2., paragraph 3:
>    [I-D.ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery]
>              Thubert, P., "6LoWPAN Selective Fragment Recovery", draft-
>              ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-21 (work in progress), March
>              2020.

  Outdated reference: draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery has been
  published as RFC 8931


Section 13.2., paragraph 4:
>    [I-D.ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment]
>              Watteyne, T., Thubert, P., and C. Bormann, "On Forwarding
>              6LoWPAN Fragments over a Multihop IPv6 Network", draft-
>              ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-15 (work in progress), March
>              2020.

  Outdated reference: draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment has been published
  as RFC 8930
2020-12-07
09 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Lars Eggert
2020-12-04
09 Carsten Bormann
[Ballot comment]
This is a good basis for running experiments with ICN in constrained node network environments.
There are a few nits left, at least …
[Ballot comment]
This is a good basis for running experiments with ICN in constrained node network environments.
There are a few nits left, at least one of which needs to be addressed before moving this forward to the next process step.

The "C" flag is rather confusing for the reader (set to 0 for compression); could this be an "U" (uncompressed) flag?
Clearly, the erroneous Table 1 reflects the need for such a change.

RFC 8930 and related have been published; this puts the present specification on somewhat firmer ground.
2020-12-04
09 Carsten Bormann [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Carsten Bormann
2020-12-01
09 Dirk Kutscher [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Dirk Kutscher
2020-11-30
09 David Oran [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for David Oran
2020-11-30
09 Colin Perkins IRTF state changed to In IRSG Poll from IRSG Review
2020-11-30
09 Colin Perkins Created IRSG Ballot
2020-10-30
09 (System) Revised ID Needed tag cleared
2020-10-30
09 Cenk Gündoğan New version available: draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-09.txt
2020-10-30
09 (System) New version approved
2020-10-30
09 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Christian Tschudin , Cenk Gundogan , Christopher Scherb , Claudio Marxer , Matthias Waehlisch , Thomas Schmidt
2020-10-30
09 Cenk Gündoğan Uploaded new revision
2020-08-25
08 Colin Perkins
Carsten Bormann completed initial review for IRSG. Some editorial comments sent direct to authors. Also concerns about IANA registration of code-points to resolve with the …
Carsten Bormann completed initial review for IRSG. Some editorial comments sent direct to authors. Also concerns about IANA registration of code-points to resolve with the authors and designated IANA expert. Further review comments to come.
2020-08-25
08 Colin Perkins Tag Revised I-D Needed set.
2020-08-25
08 Colin Perkins IRTF state changed to IRSG Review from Awaiting IRSG Reviews
2020-07-13
08 Colin Perkins IANA early review complete; -08 draft addresses concerns of designated expert. Moving to IRSG review.
2020-07-13
08 Colin Perkins IRTF state changed to Awaiting IRSG Reviews from Waiting for IRTF Chair
2020-06-26
08 Colin Perkins Agreement that the IANA actions are now clear. Now ready for IRSG review.
2020-06-23
08 Colin Perkins In IANA review
2020-05-25
08 Colin Perkins Awaiting IANA review
2020-05-25
08 Colin Perkins IRTF state changed to Waiting for IRTF Chair from Waiting for Document Shepherd
2020-05-01
08 (System) Revised ID Needed tag cleared
2020-05-01
08 Cenk Gündoğan New version available: draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-08.txt
2020-05-01
08 (System) New version approved
2020-05-01
08 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Matthias Waehlisch , Claudio Marxer , Cenk Gundogan , Thomas Schmidt , Christian Tschudin , Christopher Scherb
2020-05-01
08 Cenk Gündoğan Uploaded new revision
2020-04-20
07 Colin Perkins Revised draft (likely) needed to address IANA review.
2020-04-20
07 Colin Perkins Tag Revised I-D Needed set.
2020-04-20
07 Colin Perkins IRTF state changed to Waiting for Document Shepherd from Waiting for IRTF Chair
2020-04-13
07 Colin Perkins Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2020-04-08
07 Dirk Kutscher IRTF state changed to Waiting for IRTF Chair from Active RG Document
2020-04-08
07 Dirk Kutscher
1) Summary
This document defines a convergence layer for CCNx and NDN over IEEE
802.15.4 LoWPAN networks.

2) Review and Consensus
The draft has received …
1) Summary
This document defines a convergence layer for CCNx and NDN over IEEE
802.15.4 LoWPAN networks.

2) Review and Consensus
The draft has received fruitful reviews by members of the ICN
community and the research group for a period
of two years. It is the consensus of ICNRG that this document should
be published in the IRTF Stream of the RFC series.
2020-04-08
07 Dirk Kutscher Notification list changed to Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net>
2020-04-08
07 Dirk Kutscher Document shepherd changed to Dirk Kutscher
2020-03-09
07 Cenk Gündoğan New version available: draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-07.txt
2020-03-09
07 (System) New version approved
2020-03-09
07 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Christopher Scherb , Matthias Waehlisch , Thomas Schmidt , Christian Tschudin , Claudio Marxer , Cenk Gundogan
2020-03-09
07 Cenk Gündoğan Uploaded new revision
2019-11-17
06 David Oran Added to session: IETF-106: icnrg  Mon-1000
2019-11-04
06 Cenk Gündoğan New version available: draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-06.txt
2019-11-04
06 (System) New version approved
2019-11-04
06 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Matthias Waehlisch , Thomas Schmidt , Cenk Gundogan , Christopher Scherb , Christian Tschudin , Claudio Marxer
2019-11-04
06 Cenk Gündoğan Uploaded new revision
2019-09-19
05 Cenk Gündoğan New version available: draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-05.txt
2019-09-19
05 (System) New version approved
2019-09-19
05 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Matthias Waehlisch , Thomas Schmidt , Cenk Gundogan , Christopher Scherb , Christian Tschudin , Claudio Marxer
2019-09-19
05 Cenk Gündoğan Uploaded new revision
2019-07-22
04 Thomas Schmidt New version available: draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-04.txt
2019-07-22
04 (System) New version approved
2019-07-22
04 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Matthias Waehlisch , Thomas Schmidt , Cenk Gundogan , Christopher Scherb , Christian Tschudin , Claudio Marxer
2019-07-22
04 Thomas Schmidt Uploaded new revision
2019-07-08
03 Cenk Gündoğan New version available: draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-03.txt
2019-07-08
03 (System) New version approved
2019-07-08
03 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Matthias Waehlisch , Thomas Schmidt , Cenk Gundogan , Christopher Scherb , Christian Tschudin , Claudio Marxer
2019-07-08
03 Cenk Gündoğan Uploaded new revision
2019-03-08
02 Cenk Gündoğan New version available: draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-02.txt
2019-03-08
02 (System) New version approved
2019-03-08
02 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Matthias Waehlisch , Thomas Schmidt , Cenk Gundogan , Christopher Scherb , Christian Tschudin , Claudio Marxer
2019-03-08
02 Cenk Gündoğan Uploaded new revision
2018-11-27
01 Cenk Gündoğan New version available: draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-01.txt
2018-11-27
01 (System) New version approved
2018-11-27
01 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Matthias Waehlisch , Thomas Schmidt , Cenk Gundogan , Christopher Scherb , Christian Tschudin , Claudio Marxer
2018-11-27
01 Cenk Gündoğan Uploaded new revision
2018-11-06
00 David Oran Added to session: IETF-103: icnrg  Thu-0900
2018-10-22
00 David Oran IRTF state changed to Active RG Document
2018-10-22
00 David Oran Intended Status changed to Experimental from None
2018-10-22
00 David Oran This document now replaces draft-gundogan-icnrg-ccnlowpan instead of None
2018-10-22
00 Cenk Gündoğan New version available: draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan-00.txt
2018-10-22
00 (System) WG -00 approved
2018-10-22
00 Cenk Gündoğan Set submitter to "Cenk Gundogan ", replaces to draft-gundogan-icnrg-ccnlowpan and sent approval email to group chairs: icnrg-chairs@ietf.org
2018-10-22
00 Cenk Gündoğan Uploaded new revision