%% You should probably cite rfc9009 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-18, number = {draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-18}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao/18/}, author = {Rahul Jadhav and Pascal Thubert and Rabi Narayan Sahoo and Zhen Cao}, title = {{Efficient Route Invalidation}}, pagetotal = 21, year = 2020, month = apr, day = 15, abstract = {This document explains the problems associated with the use of No-Path Destination Advertisement Object (NPDAO) messaging in RFC 6550 and also discusses the requirements for an optimized route invalidation messaging scheme. Further, this document specifies a new proactive route invalidation message called the "Destination Cleanup Object" (DCO), which fulfills requirements for optimized route invalidation messaging.}, }