%% You should probably cite rfc8237 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-pals-status-reduction-00,
    number =    {draft-ietf-pals-status-reduction-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-status-reduction/00/},
    author =    {Luca Martini and George Swallow and Elisa Bellagamba},
    title =     {{MPLS LSP PW status refresh reduction for Static Pseudowires}},
    pagetotal = 17,
    year =      2016,
    month =     feb,
    day =       4,
    abstract =  {This document describes a method for generating an aggregated pseudowire status message on Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) network Label Switched Path (LSP). The method for transmitting the pseudowire (PW) status information is not new, however this protocol extension allows a Service Provider (SP) to reliably monitor the individual PW status while not overwhelming the network of multiple periodic status messages. This is achieved by sending a single cumulative summary status verification message for all the PWs grouped in the same LSP.},
}