Review request
draft-ietf-opsawg-mud
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08 |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | 08 (document currently at 25) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2017-08-29 | |
Requested | 2017-08-15 | |
Requested by | Joe Clarke | |
Authors | Eliot Lear , Ralph Droms , Dan Romascanu | |
WG chairs | Henk Birkholz , Joe Clarke | |
I-D last updated | 2020-01-20 | |
IESG document state | Became RFC 8520 (Proposed Standard) | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Early review of -08
by Adam W. Montville
(diff)
Genart Early review of -08 by Robert Sparks (diff) Iotdir Early review of -08 by Henk Birkholz (diff) Yangdoctors Early review of -08 by Martin Björklund (diff) Rtgdir Last Call review of -13 by Adrian Farrel (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Adam W. Montville (diff) Genart Telechat review of -20 by Robert Sparks (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -20 by Scott O. Bradner (diff) |
|
Comments |
The opsawg working group feels this document is generally in good shape, and the work has been progressing nicely. The document is very readable, and it would benefit from an early review especially around areas of security and IoT. By MUD's very nature, it relies on trust and needs to be friendly to constrained, purpose-built devices. The YANG modules defined within have been previously reviewed, but could use a new set of YANG Doctor eyes. In particular, comments have been raised about what leafs should be mandatory (if any). Thank you. |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Robert Sparks |
State | Completed | |
Review |
review-ietf-opsawg-mud-08-genart-early-sparks-2017-08-30
|
|
Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 25) | |
Result | Almost ready | |
Completed | 2017-08-30 |
History
Date | By | Description |
---|