%% You should probably cite rfc8275 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-nfsv4-umask-03, number = {draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-03}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask/03/}, author = {J. Bruce Fields and Andreas Gruenbacher}, title = {{Allowing Inheritable NFSv4 ACLs to Override the Umask}}, pagetotal = 6, year = 2017, month = mar, day = 3, abstract = {In many important environments, inheritable NFSv4 ACLs can be rendered ineffective by the application of the per-process umask. This can be addressed by transmitting the umask and create mode as separate pieces of data, allowing the server to make more intelligent decisions about the permissions to set on new files. This document proposes a protocol extension which accomplishes that.}, }