Use of the SHAKE One-Way Hash Functions in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-18
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-28
|
18 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2020-01-13
|
18 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR |
2019-11-14
|
18 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT |
2019-09-17
|
18 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-18.txt |
2019-09-17
|
18 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-09-17
|
18 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2019-09-17
|
18 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2019-09-11
|
17 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
2019-09-10
|
17 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors |
2019-09-10
|
17 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2019-09-09
|
17 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2019-09-09
|
17 | (System) | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2019-09-09
|
17 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2019-09-09
|
17 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2019-09-09
|
17 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent |
2019-09-09
|
17 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2019-09-09
|
17 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2019-09-09
|
17 | Amy Vezza | Ballot approval text was generated |
2019-09-06
|
17 | Roman Danyliw | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup |
2019-08-26
|
17 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request closed, assignment withdrawn: Menachem Dodge Last Call OPSDIR review |
2019-08-26
|
17 | Gunter Van de Velde | Closed request for Last Call review by OPSDIR with state 'Withdrawn' |
2019-08-08
|
17 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed |
2019-08-08
|
17 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-17.txt |
2019-08-08
|
17 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-08-08
|
17 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2019-08-08
|
17 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2019-08-08
|
16 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation |
2019-08-08
|
16 | Cindy Morgan | Ballot writeup was changed |
2019-08-08
|
16 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Not OK |
2019-08-08
|
16 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Not OK from Version Changed - Review Needed |
2019-08-08
|
16 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot comment] As per Roman's reply: the document should clarify that values TBD1..TBD4 are defined in another document and should be updated in this draft … [Ballot comment] As per Roman's reply: the document should clarify that values TBD1..TBD4 are defined in another document and should be updated in this draft once the other document gets published. |
2019-08-08
|
16 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to No Objection from Discuss |
2019-08-07
|
16 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed |
2019-08-07
|
16 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-16.txt |
2019-08-07
|
16 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-08-07
|
16 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2019-08-07
|
16 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2019-08-07
|
15 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2019-08-07
|
15 | Warren Kumari | [Ballot comment] I also support Alexey's discuss -- should be a trivial tix though. |
2019-08-07
|
15 | Warren Kumari | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Warren Kumari |
2019-08-07
|
15 | Martin Vigoureux | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Vigoureux |
2019-08-06
|
15 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2019-08-06
|
15 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2019-08-05
|
15 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2019-08-05
|
15 | Éric Vyncke | [Ballot comment] Thank you for the work put into this document. I second Alexey's DISCUSS that is easy to fix. Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == … [Ballot comment] Thank you for the work put into this document. I second Alexey's DISCUSS that is easy to fix. Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == -- Section 4.1 -- Can you check whether the begin and the end of this section are consistent ? I.e. "id-shake128 and id-shake256 OIDs" vs. "output length of SHA256 or SHAKE256" ? I must admit that my knowledge of crypto is not paramount but I find this weird. -- Section 4.2.1 -- Is there any reason why length are measured in bytes while in other sections it is in bits? Readers can do the math of course but why making the text more complex to parse? == NITS == -- Section 3 -- Why are some object identifier are fully in lowercase and some are a mix of lower and uppercase characters? |
2019-08-05
|
15 | Éric Vyncke | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke |
2019-08-05
|
15 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2019-08-02
|
15 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot discuss] This is a fine document, but I have one quick question: Values TBD1..TBD4 are not listed in the IANA Considerations section. Should they … [Ballot discuss] This is a fine document, but I have one quick question: Values TBD1..TBD4 are not listed in the IANA Considerations section. Should they be? |
2019-08-02
|
15 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov |
2019-08-01
|
15 | Amanda Baber | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed |
2019-07-30
|
15 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
2019-07-22
|
15 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-15.txt |
2019-07-22
|
15 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-07-22
|
15 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2019-07-22
|
15 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2019-07-22
|
14 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-14.txt |
2019-07-22
|
14 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-07-22
|
14 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2019-07-22
|
14 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2019-07-22
|
13 | Roman Danyliw | IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup::AD Followup |
2019-07-22
|
13 | Amy Vezza | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2019-08-08 |
2019-07-22
|
13 | Roman Danyliw | Ballot has been issued |
2019-07-22
|
13 | Roman Danyliw | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw |
2019-07-22
|
13 | Roman Danyliw | Created "Approve" ballot |
2019-07-22
|
13 | Roman Danyliw | Ballot writeup was changed |
2019-07-21
|
13 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed |
2019-07-21
|
13 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed |
2019-07-21
|
13 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-13.txt |
2019-07-21
|
13 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-07-21
|
13 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2019-07-21
|
13 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2019-07-11
|
12 | Roman Danyliw | IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup::Revised I-D Needed from Waiting for Writeup |
2019-07-11
|
12 | Scott Bradner | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Scott Bradner. Sent review to list. |
2019-07-03
|
12 | (System) | IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call |
2019-07-02
|
12 | Sabrina Tanamal | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Not OK |
2019-07-01
|
12 | Daniel Migault | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Daniel Migault. Sent review to list. |
2019-07-01
|
12 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Not OK from IANA - Review Needed |
2019-07-01
|
12 | Sabrina Tanamal | (Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: The IANA Functions Operator has completed its review of draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-11. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let … (Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: The IANA Functions Operator has completed its review of draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-11. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us know. The IANA Functions Operator understands that, upon approval of this document, there is a single action which we must complete. In the SMI Security for S/MIME Module Identifier (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.0) registry on the Structure of Management Information (SMI) Numbers (MIB Module Registrations) registry page located at: https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/ a single new registration is to be made as follows: Decimal: [ TBD-at-Registration ] Description: CMSAlgsForSHAKE-2019 Reference: [ RFC-to-be ] As this document requests registrations in a Specification Required (see RFC 8126) registry, we will initiate the required Expert Review via a separate request. An expert review will need to be completed before your document can be approved for publication as an RFC. The IANA Functions Operator understands that this is the only action required to be completed upon approval of this document. Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is meant only to confirm the list of actions that will be performed. Thank you, Sabrina Tanamal Senior IANA Services Specialist |
2019-06-30
|
12 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-12.txt |
2019-06-30
|
12 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-06-30
|
12 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2019-06-30
|
12 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2019-06-25
|
11 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Menachem Dodge |
2019-06-25
|
11 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Menachem Dodge |
2019-06-25
|
11 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Scott Bradner |
2019-06-25
|
11 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Scott Bradner |
2019-06-22
|
11 | Watson Ladd | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Watson Ladd. Sent review to list. |
2019-06-22
|
11 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Daniel Migault |
2019-06-22
|
11 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Daniel Migault |
2019-06-22
|
11 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Watson Ladd |
2019-06-22
|
11 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Watson Ladd |
2019-06-21
|
11 | Roman Danyliw | Requested Last Call review by OPSDIR |
2019-06-21
|
11 | Roman Danyliw | Requested Last Call review by SECDIR |
2019-06-21
|
11 | Vijay Gurbani | Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani. Sent review to list. |
2019-06-20
|
11 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Vijay Gurbani |
2019-06-20
|
11 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Vijay Gurbani |
2019-06-19
|
11 | Amy Vezza | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2019-06-19
|
11 | Amy Vezza | The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2019-07-03): From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: rdd@cert.org, draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes@ietf.org, Russ Housley , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, … The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2019-07-03): From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: rdd@cert.org, draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes@ietf.org, Russ Housley , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com, spasm@ietf.org Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Use of the SHAKE One-way Hash Functions in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)) to Proposed Standard The IESG has received a request from the Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME WG (lamps) to consider the following document: - 'Use of the SHAKE One-way Hash Functions in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2019-07-03. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document describes the conventions for using the SHAKE family of hash functions with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) as one-way hash functions with the RSA Probabilistic signature and ECDSA signature algorithms, as message digests and message authentication codes. The conventions for the associated signer public keys in CMS are also described. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. The document contains these normative downward references. See RFC 3967 for additional information: rfc8017: PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.2 (Informational - IETF stream) |
2019-06-19
|
11 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2019-06-19
|
11 | Roman Danyliw | Last call was requested |
2019-06-19
|
11 | Roman Danyliw | Last call announcement was generated |
2019-06-19
|
11 | Roman Danyliw | Ballot approval text was generated |
2019-06-19
|
11 | Roman Danyliw | Ballot writeup was generated |
2019-06-19
|
11 | Roman Danyliw | IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup |
2019-06-17
|
11 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-11.txt |
2019-06-17
|
11 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-06-17
|
11 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2019-06-17
|
11 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2019-06-12
|
10 | Roman Danyliw | AD Review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Fi8jwwspJ-69cRiB1MiLaHUvm98 |
2019-04-25
|
10 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-10.txt |
2019-04-25
|
10 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-04-25
|
10 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2019-04-25
|
10 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2019-04-11
|
09 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-09.txt |
2019-04-11
|
09 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-04-11
|
09 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2019-04-11
|
09 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2019-03-27
|
08 | Cindy Morgan | Shepherding AD changed to Roman Danyliw |
2019-03-24
|
08 | Russ Housley | Added to session: IETF-104: lamps Tue-1120 |
2019-03-08
|
08 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-08.txt |
2019-03-08
|
08 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-03-08
|
08 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2019-03-08
|
08 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2019-01-31
|
07 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-07.txt |
2019-01-31
|
07 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-01-31
|
07 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2019-01-31
|
07 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2019-01-14
|
06 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed |
2019-01-14
|
06 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-06.txt |
2019-01-14
|
06 | (System) | New version approved |
2019-01-14
|
06 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2019-01-14
|
06 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2018-12-21
|
05 | Eric Rescorla | IESG state changed to AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from Publication Requested |
2018-12-21
|
05 | Eric Rescorla | Waiting for revision (same issues as PKIX draft) |
2018-12-18
|
05 | Russ Housley | Shepherd Write-up for draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-05 (1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the … Shepherd Write-up for draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-05 (1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? Is this type of RFC indicated in the title page header? Proposed Standard. Yes, the header call for Standards Track. (2) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document Announcement Write-Up. Please provide such a Document Announcement Write-Up. Recent examples can be found in the "Action" announcements for approved documents. The approval announcement contains the following sections: Technical Summary: This document describes the conventions for using the SHAKE family of hash functions with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) as one-way hash functions with the RSA Probabilistic signature and ECDSA signature algorithms, as message digests and message authentication codes. The conventions for the associated signer public keys in CMS are also described. Working Group Summary: There is consensus for this document in the LAMPS WG. Document Quality: S/MIME has wide support, and it depends on the CMS. A few people have expressed interest in using SHAKE in their implementations. Personnel: Russ Housley is the document shepherd. Eric Rescorla is the responsible area director. (3) Briefly describe the review of this document that was performed by the Document Shepherd. If this version of the document is not ready for publication, please explain why the document is being forwarded to the IESG. The document shepherd did a thorough review of the document during WG Last Call. All issues raised have been resolved. (4) Does the document Shepherd have any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed? No concerns. (5) Do portions of the document need review from a particular or from broader perspective, e.g., security, operational complexity, AAA, DNS, DHCP, XML, or internationalization? If so, describe the review that took place. No special review needed. (6) Describe any specific concerns or issues that the Document Shepherd has with this document that the Responsible Area Director and/or the IESG should be aware of? For example, perhaps he or she is uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or has concerns whether there really is a need for it. In any event, if the WG has discussed those issues and has indicated that it still wishes to advance the document, detail those concerns here. No concerns. (7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed. If not, explain why? The authors have explicitly stated that they are unaware of any IPR related to this document. (8) Has an IPR disclosure been filed that references this document? If so, summarize any WG discussion and conclusion regarding the IPR disclosures. No IPR disclosures have been submitted against this Internet-Draft. (9) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and agree with it? There is consensus for this document in the LAMPS WG. (10) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme discontent? If so, please summarise the areas of conflict in separate email messages to the Responsible Area Director. (It should be in a separate email because this questionnaire is publicly available.) No one has threatened an appeal. (11) Identify any ID nits the Document Shepherd has found in this document. (See http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ and the Internet-Drafts Checklist). Boilerplate checks are not enough; this check needs to be thorough. This document has a normative reference to Informational RFC 8017, which is not already in the downref registry. See the response to question (15) below. (12) Describe how the document meets any required formal review criteria, such as the MIB Doctor, media type, and URI type reviews. None needed. (13) Have all references within this document been identified as either normative or informative? Yes, the references are divided into normative and informative. (14) Are there normative references to documents that are not ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state? If such normative references exist, what is the plan for their completion? All normative references are already published. (15) Are there downward normative references references (see RFC 3967)? If so, list these downward references to support the Area Director in the Last Call procedure. This document has a normative reference to Informational RFC 8017. I am quite surprised there is not a previous downref to PKCS#1 v2.2. I observe that PKCS#1 v2.1 (RFC 3447) is already in the downref registry. Please call out the normative reference to RFC 8017 in the IETF Last Call, and then add RFC 8017 to the downref registry. (16) Will publication of this document change the status of any existing RFCs? Are those RFCs listed on the title page header, listed in the abstract, and discussed in the introduction? If the RFCs are not listed in the Abstract and Introduction, explain why, and point to the part of the document where the relationship of this document to the other RFCs is discussed. If this information is not in the document, explain why the WG considers it unnecessary. Publication of this document will not change the status of any other documents. (17) Describe the Document Shepherd's review of the IANA considerations section, especially with regard to its consistency with the body of the document. Confirm that all protocol extensions that the document makes are associated with the appropriate reservations in IANA registries. Confirm that any referenced IANA registries have been clearly identified. Confirm that newly created IANA registries include a detailed specification of the initial contents for the registry, that allocations procedures for future registrations are defined, and a reasonable name for the new registry has been suggested (see RFC 5226). One ASN.1 module identifier needs to be assigned by IANA. In addition, it is worth noting that NIST will assign the needed algorithm identifiers once the document is approved. (18) List any new IANA registries that require Expert Review for future allocations. Provide any public guidance that the IESG would find useful in selecting the IANA Experts for these new registries. No new IANA registries are needed. (19) Describe reviews and automated checks performed by the Document Shepherd to validate sections of the document written in a formal language, such as XML code, BNF rules, MIB definitions, etc. ASN.1 is used. I compiled the module in Appendix A. |
2018-12-18
|
05 | Russ Housley | Responsible AD changed to Eric Rescorla |
2018-12-18
|
05 | Russ Housley | IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up |
2018-12-18
|
05 | Russ Housley | IESG state changed to Publication Requested |
2018-12-18
|
05 | Russ Housley | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2018-12-18
|
05 | Russ Housley | Changed document writeup |
2018-12-18
|
05 | Russ Housley | Notification list changed to Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> |
2018-12-18
|
05 | Russ Housley | Document shepherd changed to Russ Housley |
2018-12-18
|
05 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-05.txt |
2018-12-18
|
05 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-12-18
|
05 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2018-12-18
|
05 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2018-12-17
|
04 | Russ Housley | IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call |
2018-11-30
|
04 | Russ Housley | IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document |
2018-11-30
|
04 | Russ Housley | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2018-11-30
|
04 | Russ Housley | Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None |
2018-11-29
|
04 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-04.txt |
2018-11-29
|
04 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-11-29
|
04 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2018-11-29
|
04 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2018-11-25
|
03 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-03.txt |
2018-11-25
|
03 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-11-25
|
03 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2018-11-25
|
03 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2018-10-22
|
02 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-02.txt |
2018-10-22
|
02 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-10-22
|
02 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2018-10-22
|
02 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2018-07-15
|
01 | Russ Housley | Added to session: IETF-102: lamps Thu-1550 |
2018-06-30
|
01 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-01.txt |
2018-06-30
|
01 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-06-30
|
01 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Quynh Dang , lamps-chairs@ietf.org, Panos Kampanakis |
2018-06-30
|
01 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |
2018-02-24
|
00 | Russ Housley | Added to session: IETF-101: lamps Fri-1150 |
2018-02-16
|
00 | Russ Housley | This document now replaces draft-dang-lamps-cms-shakes-hash instead of None |
2018-02-16
|
00 | Panos Kampanakis | New version available: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-00.txt |
2018-02-16
|
00 | (System) | WG -00 approved |
2018-02-16
|
00 | Panos Kampanakis | Set submitter to "Panos Kampanakis ", replaces to draft-dang-lamps-cms-shakes-hash and sent approval email to group chairs: lamps-chairs@ietf.org |
2018-02-16
|
00 | Panos Kampanakis | Uploaded new revision |