%% You should probably cite rfc6673 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-ippm-rt-loss-03, number = {draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss-03}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss/03/}, author = {Al Morton}, title = {{Round-trip Loss Metrics}}, pagetotal = 12, year = 2012, month = mar, day = 2, abstract = {Many user applications (and the transport protocols that make them possible) require two-way communications. To assess this capability, and to achieve test system simplicity, round-trip loss measurements are frequently conducted in practice. The Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol specified in RFC 5357 establishes a round-trip loss measurement capability for the Internet. However, there is currently no metric specified according to the RFC 2330 framework. This memo adds round-trip loss to the set of IP Performance Metrics (IPPM).}, }