Summary: Has enough positions to pass.
How is the IETF Trust chair picked? I think it might be worth specifying here. Also, it would be useful to specify what subset the trustees are eligible (e.g. Nomcom appointees only or all of them) to serve as chair, and how long the chair's term will be. (I vaguely remember that the old trust administrative procedures used a 1 year term and allowed Nomcom, IESG and IAB appointees to the *IAOC* to be chair - so for sure an update is needed)
I read the protocol action, and I trust the sponsoring AD so have no problem. This ballot position may be interpreted as "This is outside my area of expertise or have no cycles"
draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale says that the IETF Trust selection of the NomCom is confirmed by the IESG. I didn't find it in this doc though. I guess it's specified in another document but I also couldn't find it quickly after a brief search. So just double-check that this is covered and wondering if it would make sense to state it explicitly in this doc as well.
I generally support this document. One small question: is it clear from this or other document which body confirms IESG selection?
Rich version of this review at: https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D12194 COMMENTS S 1. > This memo updates RFCs 4071 and 4371 with regards to the selection of > trustees. All other aspects of the IETF Trust remain as they are > today. > > For a discussion of why this change is needed and a rationale for > these specific changes, see [I-D.ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale]. I am surprised not to see any 2119 language here. Doesn't this document have normative content.