Review request
draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-11 |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | 11 (document currently at 17) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-10-04 | |
Requested | 2017-09-27 | |
Requested by | Susan Hares | |
Authors | Nitin Bahadur , Sriganesh Kini , Jan Medved | |
WG chairs | Susan Hares , Russ White | |
I-D last updated | 2018-09-26 | |
IESG document state | Became RFC 8430 (Informational) | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -08
by Ravi Singh
(diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -11 by Henning Rogge (diff) Opsdir Early review of -12 by Mahesh Jethanandani (diff) Genart Last Call review of -14 by Peter E. Yee (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Paul Wouters (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Mahesh Jethanandani (diff) |
|
Comments |
Chair urgent request for brief review prior to last call review from OPS-DIR, RTG-DIR, and YANG doctors. If the appropriate directorates could give advise to the chair, shepherd and authors in a brief first past review, we can go forward. As it is, this draft passed WG LC in June, and is stuck. Your gracious aid is appreciated. For Yang Doctors: This informational yang model did not recieve a Yang doctor's review for the informational model. The data model has received a yang doctor's review. These are synced. These are revised datastore models. Do the yang doctors want to see the following revised datastore guidelines followed: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines/. What is lacking in this informational model? For OPS-DIR/RTG-DIR: The RTG-DIR / OPS-DIR needs to check the security considerations and appropriate issues. It appears that John Scudder's review of the data model pointed out these areas related to the informational model. |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Patrice Brissette |
State | Overtaken by events | |
Review |
Not available
|
History
Date | By | Description |
---|