Ballot for draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.
I'm balloting "yes" because I think it's important to publish this. But, like Alvaro, I wonder why this is not standards track, BCP, or just about anything but informational. So I support his DISCUSS, including his the comments on how to resolve it. -1, last paragraph: This references RFC 8174, but does not use the actual 8174 boilerplate. Is there a reason not to do so?
I also believe this should be standards track. Or is there any good reason why it should not be standards track similar as other docs that define well known communities?