Summary: Has enough positions to pass.
Thanks for the work on this! IDNits notes that the draft has the 2119/8174 boilerplate, but does not use normative keywords outside of the boilerplate.
Thank you for resolving my Discuss point!
The shepherd write-up says that there have been normative references to non-IETF docs which seem to have been removed now. I wondering is that is correct. I'm by far not an expert and didn't have time to review this doc in detail but I would think that you would need to know some details of these on-IETF specs in-order to fully understand and correctly implement this YANG model, no?