Skip to main content

Using the IPv6 Flow Label for Performance Measurement with Alternate Marking Method in Segment Routing
draft-fioccola-spring-flow-label-alt-mark-01

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Expired & archived
Authors Giuseppe Fioccola , Gunter Van de Velde , Mauro Cociglio , Praveen Muley
Last updated 2018-04-29 (Latest revision 2017-10-26)
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

[RFC6294] makes a survey of Proposed Use Cases for the IPv6 Flow Label. The IPv6 protocol includes a flow label in every packet header, but this field is, according to [RFC6294], not used in practice. This document describes how the alternate marking method can be used as the passive performance measurement method in a IPv6 domain.

Authors

Giuseppe Fioccola
Gunter Van de Velde
Mauro Cociglio
Praveen Muley

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)