Current issues with existing RBNF notation for PCEP messages and extensions
draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-02

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2014-07-21 (latest revision 2014-01-10)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-02.txt

Abstract

The PCEP protocol has been defined in [RFC5440] and later extended in several RFCs. This document aims at documenting inconsistencies when implementing a set of extensions and at providing a reference, complete and formal RBNF grammar for PCEP messages, including object ordering and precedence rules.

Authors

Ramon Casellas (ramon.casellas@cttc.es)
Cyril Margaria (cyril.margaria@coriant.com)
Adrian Farrel (adrian@olddog.co.uk)
Oscar de Dios (ogondio@tid.es)
Dhruv Dhody (dhruv.dhody@huawei.com)
Xian Zhang (zhang.xian@huawei.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)