IPv4 with 64 bit Address Space
draft-chimiak-enhanced-ipv4-03
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | William Chimiak , Samuel Patton , James F. Brown , Jeronimo A Bezerra , Humberto Silva Galiza de Freitas , Jonathan Smith | ||
| Last updated | 2016-12-09 (Latest revision 2016-06-07) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes a solution to the Internet address depletion problem through use of a clever IPv4 options mechanism as a solution. This IPv4 protocol extension is called enhanced IP (EnIP). Because it is IPv4, it maximizes backward compatibility while increasing address space by a factor of 17.9 million. Unlike other similar proposals, care was taken to avoid costly changes and requirements to the core network and border routers, with the exception that options be passed in that equipment as described below. Because it is backward compatible, current IPv4 software, network equipment, firewalls, intrusion detection/protection, and layer 5 firewalls can be maintained until IPv6 system information security reaches acceptable maturity and availability.
Authors
William Chimiak
Samuel Patton
James F. Brown
Jeronimo A Bezerra
Humberto Silva Galiza de Freitas
Jonathan Smith
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)