One Way Latency Considerations for Multipath in QUIC
draft-chan-quic-owl-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Anthony Chan , Anni Wei , Fei Song , Hong-Ke Zhang | ||
| Last updated | 2017-09-14 (Latest revision 2017-03-13) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document discusses the use of One Way Latency (OWL) for enhancing multipath transmission in QUIC. Several representative usages of OWL, such as congestion control mechanism, retransmission policy, crucial data scheduling are analyzed. Two kinds of OWL measurement approaches are also provided and compared. More explorations related with OWL will be researched to improve the performance of QUIC.
Authors
Anthony Chan
Anni Wei
Fei Song
Hong-Ke Zhang
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)