Mapping System-Assisted Forwarding for Inter-Domain LISP Deployments
draft-boucadair-lisp-ms-assisted-forwarding-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Mohamed Boucadair , Christian Jacquenet | ||
| Last updated | 2016-03-20 (Latest revision 2015-09-17) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
One of the issues with current LISP operation is that some packets are likely to be lost when there is no matching mapping entry maintained by the Ingress Tunnel Router (ITR). This document proposes a solution to address this issue with a particular focus on LISP deployments at large scale. This document introduces the concept of Implicit Map-Request and Unsolicited Map-Reply messages. Also, it describes a solution to disable data gleaning for a given flow at the upstream Egress Tunnel Router (ETR).
Authors
Mohamed Boucadair
Christian Jacquenet
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)