Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
The draft has been rewritten as an update to RFC6890 to clarify past IESG and IANA concerns. My previous DISCUSS position: After looking at the comments from the IESG and IANA, it seems better to rewrite this document as an update to RFC6890 for improved clarity. The authors will work on a new version written as an update to RFC6890. I will put it up on future telechat when it is ready.
I share the concern raided by Suresh and Benoit about the difficulty in reviewing this draft without a summary of changes. There were similar concerns raised by the GenART and RTGDIR reviewers.
Thank you for the improvements from version 5 to version 6.
I am happier with the latest version and its relationship to RFC 6890.
S 2.2. Why was the Reserved-by-Protocol value for 255.255.255.255 changed? A sentence here about why would help. S 3. Daniel's name is spelled "Migault"
Pointing 2001::/32 to the entire Teredo document casts a fairly large net. I think a reference to RFC4380 section 5 would get interested parties to the information they want more rapidly.