Ballot deferred by Terry Manderson on 2018-06-20.
Summary: Has 2 DISCUSSes. Has enough positions to pass once DISCUSS positions are resolved.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
DISCUSS-DISCUSS: Shouldn't we wait to ballot on this until the ISE indicates whether a new version is coming or not?
I think this is the right conflict review response, so I should be a Yes about that, but the suggested IESG Note is making statements about what the document is missing (in the IESG's opinion) and whether the document will be useful (in the IESG's opinion), and those statements aren't in the spirit of the conflict reviews that we are asked to provide. I'd be fine with including the suggested IESG Note in the datatracker for this draft, so to be clear, I'm only objecting because the IESG Note is included in this conflict review response.
Support Alissa's Discuss - I think we should defer this document.
I agree with Adam's comment
To be clear, while I do not object to this response as formulated, I support the ongoing conversation with the ISE regarding alternate changes to the document that would alleviate the concerns expressed in the proposed additional note.