Skip to main content

IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa
conflict-review-irtf-cfrg-eddsa-00

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2016-10-17
00 Amy Vezza
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa@ietf.org,
    irsg@irtf.org,
    "Internet Research Steering Group" ,
    …
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa@ietf.org,
    irsg@irtf.org,
    "Internet Research Steering Group" ,
    irtf-chair@irtf.org,
    cfrg-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: "The IESG" ,
    iana@iana.org,
    "IETF-Announce"
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa-08

The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa-08 consistent
with RFC5742.


The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Edwards-curve Digital
Signature Algorithm (EdDSA) '  as an
Informational RFC.


The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document
and IETF work.


The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the
datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-cfrg-eddsa/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa/

The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743 

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary



2016-10-17
00 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the conflict review response
2016-10-17
00 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2016-10-17
00 Amy Vezza Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent
2016-10-13
00 Cindy Morgan Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation
2016-10-13
00 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2016-10-13
00 Mirja Kühlewind [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind
2016-10-13
00 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2016-10-12
00 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2016-10-12
00 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell
2016-10-12
00 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2016-10-12
00 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2016-10-12
00 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2016-10-12
00 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2016-10-11
00 Suresh Krishnan [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan
2016-10-11
00 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2016-10-09
00 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot comment]
I am not sure whether or not I should recuse myself, as this is CFRG document which I co-chair.
2016-10-09
00 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov
2016-10-07
00 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2016-10-07
00 Stephen Farrell Created "Approve" ballot
2016-10-07
00 Stephen Farrell Conflict Review State changed to IESG Evaluation from Needs Shepherd
2016-10-07
00 Stephen Farrell New version available: conflict-review-irtf-cfrg-eddsa-00.txt
2016-10-07
00 Stephen Farrell Placed on agenda for telechat - 2016-10-13
2016-10-07
00 Stephen Farrell Shepherding AD changed to Stephen Farrell
2016-10-07
00 Lars Eggert IETF conflict review requested