IETF conflict review for draft-fox-tcpm-shared-memory-rdma
conflict-review-fox-tcpm-shared-memory-rdma-00

The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-fox-tcpm-shared-memory-rdma@ietf.org
Cc: The IESG , , 
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-fox-tcpm-shared-memory-rdma-06

The IESG has completed a review of draft-fox-tcpm-shared-memory-rdma-06
consistent with RFC5742.


The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Shared Memory
Communications over RDMA'  as
an Informational RFC.


The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
TCPM and STORM, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.



The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the
datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-fox-tcpm-shared-memory-rdma/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fox-tcpm-shared-memory-rdma/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

[Ballot comment]

- I agree with Martin's suggestion - I think it's a fine thing if esp. such
detailed protocols that are vendor specific are more obviously vendor
specific.

- This is a bit of a monster but (flicking through it only) looks entirely
well worked out. That usually makes me wonder why a spec has been
taken via the ISE route. It might be good for the ISE (or authors) to try
to somewhere explain the logic for that.

[Ballot comment]
A note to the ISE:

It would be much better to state in the document title that this is IBM's protocol work, i.e., change the title from

"Shared Memory Communications over RDMA"

to

"IBM's Shared Memory Communications over RDMA"

[Ballot comment]
A note to the ISE:

It would be much better to state in the document title that this is IBM's protocol work, i.e., change the title from
"Shared Memory Communications over RDMA"
to
"IBM's Shared Memory Communications over RDMA"

[Ballot comment]
A note to the IESG:

It would be much better to state in the document title that this is IBM's protocol work, i.e., change the title from
"Shared Memory Communications over RDMA"
to
"IBM's Shared Memory Communications over RDMA"