Summary: Has enough positions to pass.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review? Is this charter ready for approval without external review?"
I'm a Yes, but I'm not a Responsible AD Yes. The ballot tab says "ready w/o external review", but both questions are on the ballot itself. I wouldn't object to external review if other people thought it was important, but I'm happier if people in other SDOs assume we're already looking at deployment experience :D. The following is a nit, of course. The last sentence in "The global deployment of IPv6 is underway, creating an Internet consisting of IPv4-only, IPv6-only, IPv4-IPv6 dual-stack, and IPv6+translation networks and nodes. This deployment must be properly handled to avoid the division of the Internet into separate IPv4 and IPv6 networks, ensuring addressing and connectivity for all IPv4 and IPv6 nodes. An important aspect of that has been the shutdown of IPv4 in some networks, which has resulted in innovations in network operation." took me three reads to parse. If you think it could be more clear, I might suggest replacing it with "An important aspect of IPv6 deployment has been the shutdown of IPv4 in some networks, and this shutdown has resulted in innovations in network operation". And, now that I think I understand what is being said, I wonder if "An important aspect of IPv6 deployment has been the shutdown of IPv4 in some networks, and issues and opportunities from these shutdowns have resulted in innovations in network operation", matching your new goal #3 (issues, opportunities, innovations) might be clearer. But Yes, please change the charter to do this work, however you describe it!