Note: This ballot was opened for revision 18-10 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
I think this is ready for external review, which I understand to be the intent. I do not think it is ready for approval until the external review occurs.
With Alia's edit for removing the I2RS protocol, I think this is ready.
The first paragraph... The NETCONF Working Group, previously named after the NETCONF protocol, now renamed as the NETwork CONFiguration Working Group, is responsible for the development and maintenance of protocols for YANG data model driven management, for the necessary framework where these protocols run, and for the YANG modules that formalize protocol behavior and are required from a protocol perspective. ...seems to have significantly widened what the netconf WG is responsible for beyond NETCONF/RESTCONF, but the rest of the charter only talks about those two protocols. If the intent is to allow the WG to work on other protocols (or at least consider them if they exist, are brought to the WG, etc.), then it may be a good idea to include text that specifically mentions it.