Ballot for charter-ietf-mmusic
Yes
No Objection
Abstain
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review? Is this charter ready for approval without external review?"
I agree that this does not require external review. As Alissa mentions, CLUE will be closing soon; I agree that it would make sense to remove mention of them from the MMUSIC charter.
This is a minor update to inherit ICE maintenance after we close the ICE working group. There is no change to the current list of MMUSIC milestones.
I would be a Yes after the responsible AD ballots Yes.
I don't think this needs external review. "Maintain the specifications of the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) and specify extensions to it with demonstrated interest and value." --> Maybe "where there is demonstrated interest and value"? The way it is written now sounds a bit weird. Isn't CLUE closing soon? I wonder if it still needs to be listed.
approval without external review seems fine.
Just wondering if we should approve this now or when ICE is actually closed (to avoid confusion). Or when is ICE to be expected to be closed?
I'm actually not enthusiastic about moving ICE back into MMUSIC. That really never made sense in terms of the WG members or technology stack. However, I recognize that I'm in the rough.