Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange
charter-ietf-mile-04
Yes
(Sean Turner)
(Stephen Farrell)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stewart Bryant)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02-02 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -02-02)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -02-02)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-02)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-02)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
(was Block)
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-07-11 for -02-03)
Unknown
Looking at the paragraph starting with "- Revise the IODEF document to incorporate enhancements and extensions based on operational experience." It seems that the rest of paragraph explains the WHY, and not the WHAT. It's useful info, but not there. I'm not too sure what the enhancements and extensions are about in fact.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-02)
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-02)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-02)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-02)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-02)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-07-10 for -02-02)
Unknown
Dumb little typo: OLD The MILE WG is focused on two areas, NEW The MILE WG is focused on two areas:
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-02)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-03)
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-02)
Unknown
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-07-11 for -02-02)
Unknown
I tend to support Benoit's block on this one. I'm not convinced that there's a way to fix this without preventing the working group from doing the work they want to do, but I'd like to see a little more dialog with the principals before reaching that conclusion.