Skip to main content

Forwarding and Control Element Separation
charter-ietf-forces-04

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
04 (System) Notify list changed from forces@ietf.org, forces-chairs@tools.ietf.org to (None)
2013-05-17
04 Cindy Morgan New version available: charter-ietf-forces-04.txt
2013-05-17
03-11 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved from IESG review
2013-05-17
03-11 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the charter
2013-05-17
03-11 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-05-17
03-11 Cindy Morgan Closed "Ready for external review" ballot
2013-05-17
03-11 Cindy Morgan Version 03-11 fixes typo ("doument" -> "document")
2013-05-17
03-11 Cindy Morgan New version available: charter-ietf-forces-03-11.txt
2013-05-17
03-10 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2013-05-17
03-09 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2013-05-17
03-09 Cindy Morgan Version -10 removes goals and milestones so they don't show up twice on the charter page.
2013-05-17
03-10 Cindy Morgan New version available: charter-ietf-forces-03-10.txt
2013-05-16
03-08 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2013-05-16
03-08 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-05-15
03-08 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2013-05-15
03-08 Spencer Dawkins
[Ballot comment]
My apologies for not noticing this previously, and if it's been discussed, I didn't see it in the tracker ...

In this text: …
[Ballot comment]
My apologies for not noticing this previously, and if it's been discussed, I didn't see it in the tracker ...

In this text:

In addition to the specific work items listed above, the working group will
allow discussions and review work of how to use ForCES to model topics of
interest to Network Function Virtualization, I2RS, or OpenFlow.

is "or OpenFlow" too specific? One answer could be "no" ...
2013-05-15
03-08 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2013-05-15
03-08 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-05-15
03-08 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-05-15
03-08 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-05-14
03-08 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-05-12
03-09 Adrian Farrel New version available: charter-ietf-forces-03-09.txt
2013-05-12
03-08 Ted Lemon [Ballot comment]
Inter-FE connectivity: s/Logigal/Logical/

The charter is nice and tight.
2013-05-12
03-08 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-05-09
03-08 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-05-09
03-08 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-05-08
03-08 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-05-08
03-08 Adrian Farrel New version available: charter-ietf-forces-03-08.txt
2013-05-08
03-07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
"1. Allow complex metadata"

A plate of spaghetti is a complex. Hopefully you mean "compound" or "structured"?.
2013-05-08
03-07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-05-03
03-07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-05-03
03-07 Adrian Farrel Created "Approve" ballot
2013-05-03
03-07 Adrian Farrel State changed to IESG review from External review
2013-04-26
03-07 Cindy Morgan Telechat date has been changed to 2013-05-16 from 2013-04-25
2013-04-26
03-07 Cindy Morgan State changed to External review from Internal review
2013-04-26
03-07 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2013-04-26
03-06 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2013-04-25
03-06 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2013-04-24
03-06 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-04-24
03-06 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Since the changes in this charter are simply deltas to the current specs, it might also be nice if the WG did whatever …
[Ballot comment]
Since the changes in this charter are simply deltas to the current specs, it might also be nice if the WG did whatever work necessary (fix errata, delete unused bits, if any) to get the current specs to full Internet Standard.
2013-04-24
03-06 Pete Resnick Ballot comment text updated for Pete Resnick
2013-04-23
03-06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2013-04-23
03-06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-04-22
03-06 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
No objection to this, but a question:

Are the extensions (both to the model and the protocol) expected to create full replacements for …
[Ballot comment]
No objection to this, but a question:

Are the extensions (both to the model and the protocol) expected to create full replacements for the current specs, or are the current specs stable and these are simply additions to the protocol? I mostly wonder whether the current specs could be declared full Internet Standard at this point and the extensions move on from there, or if this is a recycle of the current specs.
2013-04-22
03-06 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-04-22
03-07 Adrian Farrel New version available: charter-ietf-forces-03-07.txt
2013-04-22
03-06 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

Two questions about this. ForCES security is currently dependent
on SCTP/IPsec (RFC5811).

I would love to know if that gets used …
[Ballot comment]

Two questions about this. ForCES security is currently dependent
on SCTP/IPsec (RFC5811).

I would love to know if that gets used and if folks are happy with
it. (To the extent they're ever happy with security gank:-) If they
are then great. If not, then perhaps more work is needed?

Also, I wondered if this re-charter might mean that the ForCES
protocol will in future be more likely to be used in situations
where security is more likely to be needed, but I couldn't figure
that out from the charter. Is that the case?
2013-04-22
03-06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-04-22
03-06 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
The binding in the following sentence does not look right, suggest:

Old
The ForCES working group is now working on a set of …
[Ballot comment]
The binding in the following sentence does not look right, suggest:

Old
The ForCES working group is now working on a set of additions to the model,
protocol, and libraries based on the experience gained from developing the
standards and from many efforts using this architecture.
New
Drawing on the experience gained from developing the
standards and from many efforts using this architecture,
the ForCES working group is now working on a set of additions to the model,
the protocol, and the libraries.
End

The text says "standards effort documents", surely this should be "Standards Track documents"?
2013-04-22
03-06 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-04-22
03-06 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-04-20
03-06 Adrian Farrel New version available: charter-ietf-forces-03-06.txt
2013-04-20
03-05 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-04-19
03-05 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-04-17
03-05 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-04-11
03-05 Adrian Farrel Notification list changed to forces@ietf.org, forces-chairs@tools.ietf.org
2013-04-11
03-05 Adrian Farrel WG review text was changed
2013-04-11
03-05 Adrian Farrel WG action text was changed
2013-04-11
03-05 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup was changed
2013-04-11
03-05 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup was generated
2013-04-11
03-05 Adrian Farrel WG review text was changed
2013-04-11
03-05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-04-11
03-05 Adrian Farrel Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-04-25
2013-04-11
03-05 Adrian Farrel WG action text was changed
2013-04-11
03-05 Adrian Farrel WG review text was changed
2013-04-11
03-05 Adrian Farrel Created "Ready for external review" ballot
2013-04-11
03-05 Adrian Farrel State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review
2013-04-03
03-05 Adrian Farrel New version available: charter-ietf-forces-03-05.txt
2013-04-03
03-04 Adrian Farrel Responsible AD changed to Adrian Farrel
2013-04-02
03-04 Adrian Farrel New version available: charter-ietf-forces-03-04.txt
2013-04-02
03-03 Adrian Farrel New version available: charter-ietf-forces-03-03.txt
2013-04-01
03-02 Adrian Farrel New version available: charter-ietf-forces-03-02.txt
2013-04-01
03-01 Adrian Farrel New version available: charter-ietf-forces-03-01.txt
2013-04-01
03-00 Adrian Farrel Initial draft of charter proposed to working group at IETF-86
2013-04-01
03-00 Adrian Farrel State changed to Informal IESG review from Approved
2013-04-01
03-00 Adrian Farrel New version available: charter-ietf-forces-03-00.txt
2009-08-29
03 (System) New version available: charter-ietf-forces-03.txt
2009-08-29
02 (System) New version available: charter-ietf-forces-02.txt
2001-07-27
01 (System) New version available: charter-ietf-forces-01.txt