Summary: Has enough positions to pass.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review? Is this charter ready for approval without external review?"
Please note - my ballot position is Yes, but the responsible AD hasn't balloted yet, so please don't charter this work based on MY Yes! Beyond that, I'm a Yes with a thought, that doesn't even need to be discussed before this charter is approved, but I'm looking at this deliverable "2) measuring the performance of the proposed solutions against pervasive monitoring" and the corresponding milestone "- Define, collect and publish performance data measuring effectiveness of DPRIVE-published technologies against pervasive monitoring attacks." and thinking that IFF this turns out to be performance data collection and measurement that could benefit from interaction with IPPM, MAPRG, or both, that might be a useful possibility to keep in mind. I don't see any reason to adjust the charter to reflect that possibility, of course. And I'm pretty sure that the more work you do on this, the clearer that will become, so please start doing the work, and if it turns out we should talk, we can talk then :-)
Aren't the first two bullet points obsolete by now? If that works is already concluded, I would recommend to remove them.