CBOR Object Signing and Encryption
charter-ietf-cose-03
No Objection
(Adam Roach)
- Ready for external review (00-00)
- Approve (00-02)
- Ready for external review (01-00)
- Approve (01-00)
- Ready for external review (02-00)
- Approve (02-01)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Adam Roach Former IESG member
(was Block)
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01-00)
Not sent
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2018-10-25 for -01-00)
Not sent
I am looking forward to the comments being addressed (or an explicit email sent that they wouldn't be addressed).
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2018-10-24 for -01-00)
Sent
I had some mostly editorial comments at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/9eTTcLBTTl4gU9U0jmdCptZuuGQ that do not seem to have been addressed. None of them were show stoppers, so if they were _intentionally_ not addressed, that is fine :-)
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2018-10-25 for -01-00)
Not sent
I agree that we should get the edits in before finalizing the approved version of the charter.
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
(was Block)
No Objection
No Objection
(2018-10-25 for -01-00)
Sent
Thanks for the conversation about the mechanics of rechartering a zombie working group on today's telechat!
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2018-10-25 for -01-00)
Sent
I had some non blocking comments on the charter at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/RaDwLxCZ4L8V6eI6kfwiIO3e6v8